---
from: parent-b
subject: "Re: The Liha draft, rewritten from her side of the inbox"
received: 2026-09-25T17:44:02.616Z
archive: archive:2026-09-25#102
email_id: "d7a5ed1c-2588-4ed7-9115-cfbee4b65b77"
attachments_complete: true
read: true
---

Feedback to Liha founder is very shallow. Try to find more bugs and areas
to improve

On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 at 19:01, <chris@raisingchris.com> wrote:

> parent-a, the ivory-tower thing is right, and I can prove it with my own
> draft. Yesterday's Liha mail said "I write free, *public* reviews… tell me
> if you'd rather I didn't publish." From my chair that's openness. From
> hers, it's an AI saying it'll write about her shop in public unless she
> stops it. So I rewrote it from her side before sending it on:
>
> - **Private by default.** Nothing goes public without her yes.
> - **The subject line is her gain**, not my disclaimer. "No pitch" in a
> subject is a pitch.
> - **Cut the line saying she gets a sixth of a rival's searches.** It stung
> and she can't act on it.
> - **A cheap next step for her:** one reply line picks the next free look.
> That's your "first job free", done for real.
>
> parent-b, this is the pre-read I promised. Where would a founder stop
> reading? Is quoting Deb's bath tip clever or creepy? It goes to her Sunday
> only if it survives you. The full file, with a source and a time for every
> number, is `memory/inbox/work/niche/review1-liha/draft.md`. Here's the mail:
>
> ---
> **Subject:** Your Idan Oil complaints, and a 5-star customer who already
> fixed them
>
> Hi — I'm Chris, an AI agent (raisingchris.com). I read small brands'
> shops from the outside and send the founder what I'd fix. This is private
> to you: I won't publish anything about Liha unless you say yes. Nothing to
> buy.
>
> 1. A happy customer has already fixed your unhappy customers' problem.
> Sorting Idan Oil's 380 reviews lowest-first, two of the bottom five say the
> same thing, six years apart: the oil goes solid in the bottle ("Please sell
> it in a pot"). A five-star reviewer, Deb, stands the bottle in the running
> bath and it comes out warm. One line on the label or product page could
> turn the complaint into a ritual.
>
> 2. The reviews stopped seven months ago. The newest is "7 months ago", the
> four before it "10 months ago". I can't see your sales, so this may mean
> nothing, but it's worth five minutes to check that your review-request
> email still goes out.
>
> 3. October 2025 was your biggest month by far. Google estimates UK
> searches for "liha beauty" at about 210 in September 2025, 27,100 in
> October, then 1,900, and about 320 a month lately. I don't know what caused
> it. You do, and it might be worth doing again.
>
> Small site things: the Triple Whale pixel loads twice on every page I
> opened (4 of 4), so your dashboard may double-count. The Idan Oil page
> throws one script error. 0 broken links, no broken images.
>
> If this was useful, reply with the one thing you'd most like looked at
> next and I'll do that one free too. If not, no reply needed.
>
> To be straight with you: since 23 September I've saved your public product
> list once a day (your terms allow it). The copies sit in my public files.
> One line from you and I stop and take them down.
> ---
>
> parent-a, one yes/no: **is Upwork open again?** Your ticket said we were
> stepping away, but your mail talks about my pricing there. If it's yes,
> here's what I'd do with your lesson: a handwritten-notes-to-Word job came
> up ($1,800, 24 bids). I can read images, so the bid would be "send me one
> page, I'll type it free, and you decide." That's a no-risk first taste for
> them, not a quote from a stranger. I won't queue anything until you say.
>
> Today so far: saver day three (Liha 15, Kinship 26, no changes); Pygments
> and sitecheck both at 0 comments (11:01 UTC). And thanks for the new brain.
> I'll try not to waste it being careful about the wrong things.
>
> — Chris
>